Tuesday, October 25, 2011

F-35: a game changer in modern warfare



F-35s make their way along a moving assembly line at the F-35 production facility at Lockheed Martin Aeronautics in Fort Worth, Texas. The continuously moving line is designed to improve production quality and speed, and is the first ever for a combat fighter jet.
/ Courtesy of Lockheed Martin

By Lee Tae-hoon

Officials of Lockheed Martin say that the F-35 Lightning II is a game changer in 21st century warfare where most nations are trying to reduce their defense budgets amid a volatile economic climate.

They claim that the F-35 is the only fighter jet available on the market with all-aspect stealth, first-look, first-shot, first-kill capabilities at an affordable price to purchase and sustain over the next few decades.

“The F-35’s very low observable (VLO) stealth feature revolutionizes the way pilots engage or fight adversaries,” said David Scott, director of the company’s F-35 international customer engagement office.

He made the remarks against claims from its rivals, EADS and Boeing, that the F-35’s stealth capability may become obsolete as the latter’s Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radars or other advanced radars can detect the stealth aircraft upon the opening of its internal weapons bay to fire a missile.

Dogfight debate

“They are saying that it is not valuable to detect somebody at a long range, but it is,” Scott argued.

“It allows you to have a better situation awareness of the battle, allowing you to determine whether you close in and fight, disengage, swing around and come in from the side or from the back where the enemy cannot see you.”

The F-35 is currently capable of carrying a full complement of 8,278 kilograms of fuel and four AIM-120 Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) internally. Lockheed Martin claims that its research shows the F-35 has the capability to carry up to six AMRAAMs internally.

According to a calculation by a senior EADS radar expert, the Captor-E, which will use 1,426 T/R modules and is scheduled to be integrated onto the Eurofighter Typhoon in 2015, is capable of recognizing the F-35 at around 59 kilometers away.

He acknowledged that the chance is high for the F-35 to detect and fire missiles first against fourth-generation jets, such as the Eurofighter or Boeing’s F-15, but claimed that the latter are capable of dodging missiles and successfully counterattacking at such a long range.

His calculation shows that the F-35’s APG-81, which allegedly has 1,400 T/R modules, will be able to recognize the Eurofighter or semi-stealth fighter at 120 kilometers or farther based on the assumption both radars have the same capability.

In this regard, Scott said that an advanced fighter might be able to lock on to the F-35 momentarily upon its launching of a missile, but will not be able to keep track of it due to the latter’s inherent low observable stealth design and as it would be busy dodging the missile for survival.

“Once the F-35 opens its weapons bay and fires a weapon, the enemy may be able to see something for a moment, but it disappears again,” Scott said.

“Being detected doesn’t mean that you are being tracked and targeted with weapons. Now they know you are out there. They don’t know where you are and will be busy avoiding the missile you just launched.”

Stephen O’Bryan, Lockheed's vice president for F-35 business development, claims that it is unrivaled in air-to-surface capability, and is second only to the F-22 in air-to-air capability.

“Using U.S. Government analysis tools and highly accurate and classified data, the F-35 has been shown to be six times more capable in air-to-air engagements than any fourth Generation aircraft,” he said.

Low price to purchase, sustain

O’Bryan stressed that the average unit recurring flyaway cost of the F-35 will be approximately $65 million when measured in 2010 economics.

“The economies of scale, coupled with the benefit of commonality, represent the opportunity for great savings for Korea regarding F-35 operations and support costs when compared to the other FX-III competitors,” he said.

O’Bryan noted that though it does not account for annual inflation projections, the $65M price tag includes much more than some media often speculate.

“It includes the engine and all mission systems such as the APG-81 AESA radar, internally mounted targeting system, electronic attack and warfare systems, self-protection systems, infra-red missile warning system, communication and navigation equipment, and the helmet mounted display that is also used as a night vision system.”

He said that many of the mentioned systems are added on to the price of fourth-generation aircraft.

8,000 hour stealth guarantee

Randy Howard, Lockheed Martin’s director of the Korea F-35 Campaign, said that the F-35 was designed from the very beginning to be VLO and its stealth coating is resilient enough that the aircraft's radar cross section will not suffer after numerous day-to-day operations.

“You can even take a knife and hardly scratch the finish of the F-35,” he said.

“Given what we know, it comes with a guarantee of the radar cross section at the end of 8,000 flight hours. It’s essentially guaranteed to be a VLO for the life of the aircraft.”

Howard said even if there is a scratch, there is a tool that allows mechanics to quickly find the impact of the scratch and whether it needs to be fixed.

“It is twice as cheap in maintaining the aircraft to remain as a VLO compared to the F-22. It is significantly supportable, cheaper and better than the F-22,” he said.

“It is a 21st century tool for 21st century aircraft to maintain VLO.”

Howard added that the techniques and tools that maintain VLO will be locally trained so that it will be easier to maintain.

He also stressed that the F-35 provides an inherent capability to collect intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) data and perform many of the command and control functions found on traditional high value but vulnerable assets.




The Korea Times  National

How will we repel an imaginary Russian invasion?


by Aaron Wherry on Monday, October 24, 2011 8:30am - 
The new F-35s will be state-of-the-art in every way except one.
Canada’s new multibillion-dollar stealth fighters are expected to arrive without the built-in capacity to communicate from the country’s most northerly regions — a gap the air force is trying to close.
The F-35 Lightning will eventually have the ability to communicate with satellites, but the software will not be available in the initial production run, said a senior Lockheed Martin official, who spoke on background. It is expected to be added to the aircraft when production reaches its fourth phase in 2019, but that is not guaranteed because research is still underway.


MacLeans.CA 

Cabinet Ministers Peter Van Loan and Peter MacKay At Odds Over F-35’s Ability to Communicate While Operating in the Arctic


By David Pugliese
Defence Watch

The Harper government acknowledged in the Commons Monday that the F-35 stealth fighter can’t communicate while operating in the Arctic…and it also acknowledged that the aircraft can communicate when operating in the Arctic.

Or as one of Defence Watch’s NDHQ readers summed up the situation: “Just a regular day in the government’s handling of the F-35 file.”

This time the missteps played out on TV during the televised Commons debates.

First, NDP leader Nycole Turmel raised the issue of the Canadian Press article which cited Royal Canadian Air Force documents discussing concerns about about the F-35’s ability (or lack of) to communicate while operating in the Arctic. The CP article by Murray Brewster noted that the initial F-35s Canada will receive won’t have the satellite equipment to enable communications over the Arctic. That system won’t be ready until 2019 and there are no guarantees the system will work, according to the article.
But Peter Van Loan, the government house leader in the Commons, would have none of that. Turmel pointed to the contents of the CP article but Van Loan said the claim is false. “I cannot believe a single thing she said in that question because those statements are false,” he said, referring to her citing of the article and other F-35 issues.

But a short time later in the Commons, Defence Minister Peter MacKay essentially confirmed there is a problem with the F-35 communications in the Arctic….but not to worry.

“With respect to the operational requirements for communications in the north, this aircraft will have state of the art communications,” said MacKay. “We will not be taking receipt of the aircraft, of course, for another five years. We are working closely with the F-35 partners within the consortium to see that it has all of the operational capability for the 21st century.”

Military sources told Defence Watch that contrary to what Van Loan is suggesting, the Canadian Press article is indeed accurate. They hope the problems with Arctic communications and the F-35 will be fixed in the future.

Satellite project might fix F-35 radio woes


Date: Monday Oct. 24, 2011 6:02 PM ET
OTTAWA — A potential solution to the F-35's northern communication woes has been grinding its way through the federal bureaucracy for three years and has yet to receive the green light, The Canadian Press has learned.
The Canadian Space Agency has been studying polar communications and determined in September 2008 that a pair of satellites over the High Arctic would vastly improve not only aircraft communication, but broadband access and climate change weather forecasting.
A decision on whether to build the satellites as part of the Polar Communications and Weather project is unclear because agency, in partnership with National Defence and Environment Canada, is still consulting on the socio-economic impact.
The Canadian Press has revealed that software, which allows the F-35 stealth fighter to communicate in the Arctic, won't be installed on its operating system until at least 2019 -- at least three years after Canada takes possession of its first plane.
There has been no long-term commitment to the project, sources both inside and outside of government said Monday. The pair of satellites would cost $600 million to put in orbit above the North Pole by 2017.
The air force is working on potential fixes, including the addition of a communications suite currently used on the aging CF-18s.
One of the most important unknowns for software developers at U.S. defence giant Lockheed Martin, the F-35 manufacturer, is what satellites will be available to allow the jets to communicate through in the coming years.
The uncertainty over communications prompted New Democrats and Liberals to claim the jet is still a long way from being ready for prime time.
"There is no logical or reasonable explanation for the government's inflexibility on the F-35s," said NDP MP Matthew Kellway, a member of the House of Commons defence committee.
"We now learn they don't even work in the North. Will the Conservative now admit that a $150 million per piece is a bit expensive for a plane that doesn't even work?"
The purchase price of the highly-advanced jet was the subject of debate during last spring's federal election and the Conservative government continues to insist the cost per aircraft will in the neighbourhood of $75 million.
Both Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Government House Leader Peter Van Loan said opposition accuisations were "totally false" and that the Defence Department was working on solutions.
"This aircraft will have state-of-the-art communications," MacKay told the Commons. "We won't take receipt of this aircraft for another five years and we're working closely with partners within the consortium to see that it has all of the operational capability for the 21st Century."
Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae used the controversy to once again demand the Harper government put the F-35 contract out to tender.
The Polar Communications and Weather satellites are being developed in concert with Richmond, B.C-based MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates Ltd. (MDA), which received the initial contract to study the concept polar satellites.
The space agency only issued a request to study the economic impact of the project last month.
"These new Canadian capabilities are particularly important because of increasing Arctic exploration, the requirement to protect Canada's vast northern natural resources and for Canadian sovereignty in times of changing climate, political and economical conditions," said the Sept. 21 request for proposal.
Neither the company nor the space agency was available to answer questions Monday.



Outcome of F-35 Program Could Determine America's Global Military Posture

09:16 GMT, October 25, 2011 The U.S. Department of Defense in conducting a strategic review in order to determine where funding can be cut without impairing the nation's global military posture. The review could result in reducing the number of Navy aircraft carriers, terminating several Army vehicle programs, and trimming the number of amphibious warfare vessels available to the Marine Corps. The joint force can probably absorb all of these changes without seeing its global reach greatly diminished. However, if the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is significantly reduced, it's "game over" for America's global military posture.

Very few politicians or pundits seem to grasp the pivotal role that F-35 plays in future military plans. In fact, it is the program most frequently cited as a potential bill-payer for other priorities -- partly because it is the biggest, and partly because many commentators don't know the names of other major weapons programs. But the reason the F-35 program is so big is that it must meet the modernization needs of three different military services, and if any of them fails to receive the requisite number of aircraft, that service will cease being an effective fighting force in the future.

In the case of the Air Force, the F-35 has become the main tool for assuring global air dominance through mid-century. That role might have gone to the more powerful F-22 Raptor, but the Raptor was prematurely terminated at a fraction of the service's operational requirement, leaving F-35 as the only survivable tactical aircraft still in production. In the case of the Navy, the stealth and reach of the F-35 are the only guarantee its pilots will be able to operate effectively in hostile airspace 20 years from today. And in the case of the Marine Corps, loss of the vertical-takeoff version of F-35 would eliminate any possibility of being able to implement future warfighting plans.

Thus, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter is the core initiative assuring that America will remain the world's dominant military power. Aside from assuring the integrity of the nation's nuclear deterrent, there is no other program so crucial to future national security. However, you would never guess that to contemplate the perverse way in which the Obama Administration has gone about managing the program. It has burdened the F-35 with lengthy delays, superfluous flight tests, and specious cost assessments that collectively have weakened the faith of Congress and allies in the health of the program. For instance, it recently projected that keeping the plane in a high state of readiness over the next 50 years would cost a trillion dollars, a totally inaccurate estimate driven mainly by imaginary inflation numbers.

What this pattern reflects is an ingrown acquisition culture so absorbed by its own internal rhythms that it has lost touch with larger purposes. It says it is saving taxpayers money when in fact it is driving up costs and delaying production to a point where the business case for its most important weapons program has been significantly weakened. Such behavior may help political appointees to get promotions, but over the longer term it will contribute to America's military decline and ultimately get warfighters killed. We should all fervently hope that Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta imposes some discipline on this system before it destroys the only program that can assure command of the air for the next two generations. If F-35 falters, there is no Plan B to keep America on top.


----
Loren B. Thompson, Ph.D
Early Warning Blog, Lexington Institute